← Back to Directory

ESG Reporting Standards: GRI, SASB, TCFD, and ESRS Compared

Navigate the landscape of ESG reporting frameworks and choose the right standard for your organization

ESG Reporting Standards: GRI, SASB, TCFD, and ESRS Compared

With multiple ESG reporting frameworks available, choosing the right standard for your organization can be challenging. Understanding the differences between GRI, SASB, TCFD, and ESRS is essential for effective sustainability reporting.

Framework Comparison

GRI (Global Reporting Initiative)

Focus: Stakeholder-focused, impact materiality

Scope: Global, comprehensive ESG coverage

Best For: Organizations reporting to broad stakeholder groups

Key Features:

  • Rigorous, prescriptive standards covering full ESG report
  • Outward-facing: focuses on company impacts on society
  • Universal Standards plus topic-specific standards
  • Most widely used framework globally

SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board)

Focus: Financial materiality for investors

Scope: 77 industry-specific standards

Best For: Investor-focused reporting, especially in US

Key Features:

  • Industry-specific metrics tailored to sector risks
  • Focus on financially material ESG issues
  • Designed for integration into financial filings
  • Now part of IFRS Foundation (merged with ISSB)

TCFD (Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures)

Focus: Climate-related financial risks

Scope: Climate change impacts and opportunities

Best For: Climate risk disclosure and scenario analysis

Key Features:

  • Four pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, Metrics & Targets
  • Voluntary framework (though increasingly required)
  • Framework disbanded in 2023; monitoring transferred to IFRS
  • Widely adopted and integrated into other standards

ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards)

Focus: Double materiality (financial + impact)

Scope: Mandatory for companies under CSRD

Best For: EU companies or those with EU operations

Key Features:

  • Mandatory legal requirement (not voluntary)
  • Comprehensive: Environmental, Social, Governance standards
  • Double materiality assessment required
  • Most demanding framework currently in force

Choosing the Right Framework

Multi-Framework Approach

Many companies use multiple frameworks:

  • GRI + SASB: Satisfy both stakeholders and investors
  • TCFD + SASB: Comprehensive climate and financial materiality
  • ESRS (mandatory) + GRI: Meet EU requirements plus global standards

Convergence and the ISSB

The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) is working toward global baseline standards, building on TCFD and SASB. This aims to reduce reporting burden while meeting diverse stakeholder needs.

Need Expert Help with ESG Reporting?

Navigating multiple ESG reporting frameworks requires specialized expertise. Connect with experienced ESG consultants who can help you choose the right standards and implement effective sustainability reporting systems.

Find ESG Reporting Experts

Related Resources

← Back to All Resources

Explore specific frameworks in detail: